SCM award files arrive incomplete.
A declaration of interest, a committee appointment letter or a tax-compliance check is missing when the auditor asks for the file, and has to be chased after the fact.
When the audit request lands, the award was made and the approval was given, but the proof is scattered across inboxes, shared drives and paper files. MuniLink helps your team find the gaps in one workflow and put the evidence in order before audit fieldwork starts.
Or send us a note and we will reply by email.
A declaration of interest, a committee appointment letter or a tax-compliance check is missing when the auditor asks for the file, and has to be chased after the fact.
Minutes in one inbox, signed copies on a shared drive, originals in a cabinet. Retrieval depends on who remembers where things went.
The decision was made by the right person, but the delegation, signature or date that proves it is not where the file says it should be.
Requests for information come with short turnaround times. Rebuilding files in a rush pulls SCM and finance staff away from their actual work.
We work on one workflow at a time, with the people who own it. The aim is a file an auditor can follow without anyone having to explain it.
Trace a sample of awards from need to signed contract and show what is on file, what is missing and who owns the fix.
Map where the evidence for one process actually lives, and agree a simple filing and naming convention your team can keep using.
Check that each approval in the workflow can be shown: who approved, under which delegation, on what date, with the signed record.
A readiness check is deliberately small, so it fits around audit season and gives your team something concrete to act on.
20 minutes on Teams or by phone. We agree the workflow, the next audit milestone and who owns the evidence.
You get: a short written scopeWe take a sample, for example a handful of recent award files, and walk the evidence trail with your team.
You get: an agreed sample and agendaEvery required record, where it is, and whether it is complete. Findings are written plainly and point to source documents.
You get: an evidence map and findings template, filled inA prioritised list of fixes with owners, before fieldwork starts. You decide whether to stop there, rehearse, or go further.
You get: a prioritised action listEvery gate ends with something your CFO, SCM head or internal audit can review, and a decision about whether to continue.
We confirm which workflow matters most right now, the date it needs to be ready by, and who owns the records. Nothing starts without a named municipal owner.
For each item in the sample we record what should be on file, what is, and where it lives. Gaps are recorded as gaps, not explained away.
We run an audit-style request against the workflow: can the team produce the file, in order, within a realistic time? This is practice, not an audit.
You decide what happens next: fix in-house, rehearse another workflow, or set up ongoing support. No predetermined rollout and no lock-in.
Audit evidence is sensitive. The way we work with it has to stand up to the same questions as the evidence itself.
We look only at the records the agreed sample needs, preferably in your own systems, and handle personal information in line with POPIA.
Findings go to the accountable official. We do not approve, sign or alter municipal records.
Each line in the evidence map points to the document, or the gap, it is based on.
We may use software, including AI-assisted search, to speed up sorting and matching. A person checks every result before it reaches you.
We do not publish testimonials we do not have or results that have not happened. Current work is shared as it actually stands.
A proposal and follow-up are in progress with a coastal municipality. Nothing has been delivered yet, so no outcomes are claimed. Any results will be published only with the municipality's permission.
Proposal and follow-up
Whether a bounded first workflow makes sense
No claims before verified, approved results
None of this is required. A rough idea of each makes the 20 minutes far more useful.
Practical material for SCM practitioners, CFOs and internal audit.
A plain checklist for testing an award file before the auditors do. Guidance, not legal advice.
Open the checklist →The agenda and pre-call questionnaire we use, so you can see exactly what a check covers.
Request by email →Six things that make a 20-minute call worth your time.
See the list →MuniLink is built by Slyvester Mngadi, a student founder in Gqeberha, for one kind of client: South African local municipalities.
The focus is narrow on purpose. Instead of selling broad "transformation", MuniLink helps a municipal team get one workflow's evidence in order, show where the gaps are, and leave the team able to keep it that way. As a young firm, MuniLink has no client results to show yet, and says so. What it offers is careful work, plain reporting and a small first step.
No one can promise that, and we do not. The Auditor-General forms its own opinion. A readiness check helps your team find and fix evidence gaps in one workflow before fieldwork.
Work is scoped after a short discovery call, because it depends on the workflow, the sample size and your timing. You get a written scope before anything is agreed, and your SCM policy decides the procurement route.
Only to the records the agreed sample needs, ideally viewed with your team in your own systems. See the privacy notice.
No. It is a service. We may use software, including AI-assisted search, to sort and match documents faster, and a person checks every result.
Tell us the workflow, your next audit milestone and who owns the evidence. We will tell you plainly whether a readiness check is worth doing now.
Teams or phone, at a time that suits you. What happens after the call. Or email munilink.agency@gmail.com · LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)